News

Imagine spending months writing a song, snapping the perfect photo, or crafting a bestselling novel—only to find out an AI company has used your work to train its algorithms without your permission. This is the reality facing UK creators as the government proposes a controversial plan to let AI firms use copyrighted material unless creators actively opt-out. Unsurprisingly, artists, writers, musicians, and publishers are pushing back hard.

Imagine browsing for your next read and spotting a logo that says “Human Authored”. What does it mean? The US Authors Guild recently launched this initiative, allowing writers to certify that their books were created by “human intellect” rather than AI. It’s a way for authors to show readers that their stories are 100% human-made—and it’s sparking important conversations about creativity, transparency, and trust in the age of artificial intelligence.

Have you ever wondered how those smart chatbots you interact with online are created? Well, some serious drama in the AI world could change the game. OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, is investigating whether a Chinese AI startup called DeepSeek used OpenAI’s technology to train its chatbot. At the heart of the issue is a technique called “distillation”, which lets companies shrink down large AI models into smaller, cheaper versions. But is this innovation—or just copying? Let’s break it down.

Big leadership changes are underway in the world of intellectual property (IP), and they could have a ripple effect on how innovation is protected and encouraged globally. Kathi Vidal, a prominent voice in IP policy, is stepping down from her role as the U.S.’s top patent official to rejoin the private sector. But her departure raises questions about what’s next for IP laws, especially with the upcoming administration’s stance on patents and innovation.