UK Creatives Fight Back Against AI Copyright Plans

Imagine spending months writing a song, snapping the perfect photo, or crafting a bestselling novel—only to find out an AI company has used your work to train its algorithms without your permission. This is the reality facing UK creators as the government proposes a controversial plan to let AI firms use copyrighted material unless creators actively opt-out. Unsurprisingly, artists, writers, musicians, and publishers are pushing back hard.

The UK government’s plan would allow AI companies like OpenAI, Google, and Meta to use copyrighted works—such as books, music, photos, and news articles—to train their AI systems. The catch? Creators would have to opt out if they didn’t want their work used. This has sparked outrage among creators, who argue it undermines their rights and devalues their work.

A coalition of creative industries, including big names like Paul McCartney, Kate Bush, and organizations like the Society of Authors and Getty Images, has rejected the proposal. They argue that existing copyright laws must be respected and enforced, not weakened. The Creative Rights in AI Coalition (Crac) stated: “Rights holders do not support the new exception to copyright proposed.” Instead, they believe AI developers should seek permission, agree to licenses, and pay creators for using their work.

The government’s proposed “opt-out system” would allow AI companies to use copyrighted material by default, unless creators explicitly say no. Supporters argue this approach will help the UK stay competitive in the global AI race. Chris Bryant, the technology and culture minister, warned that if the rules are too strict, international AI developers might simply train their models overseas and bypass the UK altogether. This, he claims, could hurt not just the tech industry but also the creative sectors that rely on innovation.

But critics aren’t buying it. Beeban Kidron, a member of the House of Lords, compared the opt-out system to asking shopkeepers to “opt out of shoplifters.” 

You might be thinking, “I’m not a musician or a writer—why should I care?” Here’s the thing: the outcome of this debate could shape the future of creativity and innovation. If AI companies can freely use copyrighted material without permission, it could devalue the work of creators, making it harder for them to earn a living. On the flip side, overly restrictive rules could stifle AI development, limiting the tools and technologies we all use every day.

It’s a delicate balance and one that affects everyone who enjoys music, movies, books, or even memes. After all, behind every piece of content you love is a creator who deserves to be recognized and rewarded.

The debate is far from over. The government’s proposal is currently in a 10-week consultation period, and creators are rallying to ensure their voices are heard. Meanwhile, AI companies are pushing for a more open system that allows them to use data while compensating rights holders.

If you’re a creator, business, or AI developer navigating the complexities of copyright law, our team at KOREJZOVA LEGAL is here to help. Contact us for expert legal advice tailored to your needs. Let’s protect your rights and your future together!